|
|
Post by Jen Johnson on Jul 5, 2010 18:25:23 GMT -5
CBS gave Natalie the worst edit EVER, on the feeds she was constantly talking game with Kevin and Lydia and working every evictee for a jury vote before they left, her real story was never told because it was the Jordan/Jeff show  |
|
|
|
Post by Keesha Smith on Jul 5, 2010 18:57:16 GMT -5
David >>>>>>> Natalie
David is the ultimate player of the BBR series.
|
|
|
|
Post by Keesha Smith on Jul 5, 2010 18:59:56 GMT -5
Well, if he makes the final 2. GOOO Davie!  |
|
|
|
Post by Jen Johnson on Jul 5, 2010 19:14:50 GMT -5
David >>>>>>> Natalie David is the ultimate player of the BBR series. Seriously?  |
|
|
|
Post by Julie Chen on Jul 5, 2010 19:24:22 GMT -5
I'm sorry Jen, but I have to stick to disagreeing. Natalie didn't work for Michele or Jeff (or Jordan). She worked her 'friends' votes maybe. and it only turned into the Jeff/Jordan show after the Jessie show ended. I know what happened. I'm not completely clueless to the edit. But all I'm saying is every winner won it fairly. You play to the jury as you said Natalie did. She didn't win = she didn't play them well enough. |
|
|
|
Post by Jen Johnson on Jul 5, 2010 19:39:33 GMT -5
Julie, we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one thing, but don't worry, you're not the first  |
|
|
|
Post by Keesha Smith on Jul 5, 2010 21:06:59 GMT -5
David >>>>>>> Natalie David is the ultimate player of the BBR series. Seriously? That's what I said. PLEASE don't try to say you are. Sadly mistaken. lulz. He's the only player to make it to the F3 twice. And if he wins, he'd be the only person to have won twice. So, that would make him the ultimate player. |
|
|
|
Post by Jen Johnson on Jul 6, 2010 12:25:37 GMT -5
I'm not saying i am, there is someone who has clearly played a better game than me and everyone else over the past 4 seasons and i am happy to admit i am far from the best player, i am just one of the best.
David is the ultimate 'non-threat' no one wants him out, it's not gameplay, it's a position, if people want to reward that ok, but i just fail to see any strategic, game changing moves that David has made this season at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Laura Crosby on Jul 6, 2010 14:11:04 GMT -5
That's a good point Keesha he has made F3 twice. No one really thinks of him as a threat b/c he's really nice. But he definately is a threat if he can be this successful twice |
|
|
|
Post by Jen Johnson on Jul 6, 2010 15:45:36 GMT -5
Again, you all seem to fail to recognise a single strategic, game changing move he made.
Case. Closed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Keesha Smith on Jul 6, 2010 16:27:28 GMT -5
That's a good point Keesha he has made F3 twice. No one really thinks of him as a threat b/c he's really nice. But he definately is a threat if he can be this successful twice Exactly. Jen needs to get over herself. Its an annoying trait to have. |
|
|
|
Post by Jen Johnson on Jul 6, 2010 16:46:10 GMT -5
I will get over myself when someone tells me one strategic, game changing move David made.
|
|
|
|
Post by Keesha Smith on Jul 6, 2010 20:28:18 GMT -5
Why are you so against David? How come you just can't respect the fact that he's a good player and that's why he got this far both times playing. There's no need to put anyone down.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick Starcevic on Jul 6, 2010 20:55:16 GMT -5
Also...how many people on the jury did he anger? I think none, which is a strategy. It's called playing to the jury.
Case. Reopened.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jen Johnson on Jul 7, 2010 3:38:22 GMT -5
I have nothing against David, i really like him and he is a nice guy, but in the context of a Jury Member to judge who played the best game to decide the winner of an All-Stars game i don't see him as anywhere near winner potential when all he did was play socially, ok it's some kind of strategy and would win him a normal season, such as season 3, but when we have an All-Stars game where people had to be cut-throat to win and people have actually played flawless games, David is honestly the least deserving out of the final 3.
Even if there was someone who i hated in the final 2, but i thought they played an amazing game, i would hand them the win. Gameplay should always be rewarded and it really annoys me when Jury's base votes on personal feelings, this is a game, gameplay should be rewarded.
|
|
